Revealed - how to pay for nuclear power
First here’s what a recent study by the Mayor of London concluded about nuclear…
- decentralised energy (locally generated and used heat and power from renewables and natural gas, with energy efficiency) could provide a cut of 27-32% in London’s emissions by 2025
- centralised nuclear power (with more stations as proposed today) would in contrast deliver 23%. In fact, in UK terms 10 new stations would only reduce emissions by around 4% by 2025
- decentralised energy systems give other benefits - local control of energy brings more energy security, uses less primary energy, empowers communities and has been done by other countries.
- nuclear power brings waste and security issues, protest, and cost. The time it takes to commission and build new stations (10 years +) sucks up money that renewables and combined heat and power so desperately need. Of course, it’s also been done by other countries.
So what about that link then? Something about breeding superbugs in nuclear reactors? Fall out generated killer viruses perhaps? Well no…. but unnecessary use of antibiotics cost the NHS £1.4 billion/year. 10 reactors at £2 billion each over say 10 years = £2 billion/year. Gordon Brown’s a sly one - I wonder where he’ll find that extra £600 k…your pension, perhaps.
(Refs Powering London into the 21st Century, Guardian online)
